How many participants do I need for a qualitative study?
While some experts in qualitative research avoid the topic of “how many” interviews “are enough,” there is indeed variability in what is suggested as a minimum. An extremely large number of articles, book chapters, and books recommend guidance and suggest anywhere from 5 to 50 participants as adequate.
It has previously been recommended that qualitative studies require a minimum sample size of at least 12 to reach data saturation (Clarke & Braun, 2013; Fugard & Potts, 2014; Guest, Bunce, & Johnson, 2006) Therefore, a sample of 13 was deemed sufficient for the qualitative analysis and scale of this study.
Based on studies that have been done in academia on this very issue, 30 seems to be an ideal sample size for the most comprehensive view, but studies can have as little as 10 total participants and still yield extremely fruitful, and applicable, results.
Mason's (2010) analysis of 560 PhD studies that adopted a qualitative interview as their main method revealed that the most common sample size in qualitative research is between 15 and 50 participants, with 20 being the average sample size in grounded theory studies (which was also the type of study I was undertaking).
Sample Size for Qualitative Studies
Need to ensure there is enough, but not too much, data (>30 too large; Boddy, 2016). One review identified that samples of 20 and 30 (and multiples of 10) were most common (Mason, 2010), with 25-30 being a typical recommendation (Dworkin, 2012).
Ensuring you've hit the right number of participants
In The logic of small samples in interview-based, authors Mira Crouch and Heather McKenzie note that using fewer than 20 participants during a qualitative research study will result in better data.
We generally recommend a panel size of 30 respondents for in-depth interviews if the study includes similar segments within the population. We suggest a minimum sample size of 10, but in this case, population integrity in recruiting is critical.
Summary: 40 participants is an appropriate number for most quantitative studies, but there are cases where you can recruit fewer users. Share this article: The exact number of participants required for quantitative usability testing can vary.
A sample size of 30 often increases the confidence interval of your population data set enough to warrant assertions against your findings.4 The higher your sample size, the more likely the sample will be representative of your population set.
Another guide for good sample size suggests : 50 as very poor; 100 as poor, 200 as fair, 300 as good, 500 as very good and 1000 as excellent (Comrey and Lee, 1992; Tabacnik and Fidell, 1996; Vanvoorhis and Morgan, 2007).
Is 25 a good sample size for quantitative research?
If the research has a relational survey design, the sample size should not be less than 30. Causal-comparative and experimental studies require more than 50 samples. In survey research, 100 samples should be identified for each major sub-group in the population and between 20 to 50 samples for each minor sub-group.
Guest et al. (2006) found that in homogeneous studies using purposeful sampling, like many qualitative studies, 12 interviews should be sufficient to achieve data saturation.
That the probability of someone encountering an issue is 31%
Based on these assumptions, Jakob Nielsen and Tom Landauer built a mathematical model that shows that, by doing a qualitative test with 5 participants, you will identify 85% of the issues in an interface.
A sample size consisting of 50-100 respondents will be sufficient for obtaining comprehensive behavioral insights during emotion measurement.
Some researchers do, however, support a rule of thumb when using the sample size. For example, in regression analysis, many researchers say that there should be at least 10 observations per variable. If we are using three independent variables, then a clear rule would be to have a minimum sample size of 30.
Although one researcher's “small” is another's large, when I refer to small sample sizes I mean studies that have typically between 5 and 30 users total—a size very common in usability studies.
Too small a sample may prevent the findings from being extrapolated, whereas too large a sample may amplify the detection of differences, emphasizing statistical differences that are not clinically relevant. We will discuss in this article the major impacts of sample size on orthodontic studies.
For example, when we are comparing the means of two populations, if the sample size is less than 30, then we use the t-test. If the sample size is greater than 30, then we use the z-test.
Sampling ratio (sample size to population size): Generally speaking, the smaller the population, the larger the sampling ratio needed. For populations under 1,000, a minimum ratio of 30 percent (300 individuals) is advisable to ensure representativeness of the sample.
Often a sample size is considered “large enough” if it's greater than or equal to 30, but this number can vary a bit based on the underlying shape of the population distribution. In particular: If the population distribution is symmetric, sometimes a sample size as small as 15 is sufficient.
Is a sample size of 50 too small?
Most statisticians agree that the minimum sample size to get any kind of meaningful result is 100. If your population is less than 100 then you really need to survey all of them.
The main results should have 95% confidence intervals (CI), and the width of these depend directly on the sample size: large studies produce narrow intervals and, therefore, more precise results. A study of 20 subjects, for example, is likely to be too small for most investigations.
Qualitative research in general
35) suggests that the smallest acceptable qualitative sample size is 15 interviews.
...
The differences between quantitative and qualitative research.
| Quantitative research | Qualitative Research |
|---|---|
| Requires many respondents | Requires few respondents |
Qualitative research seeks more in-depth, free form answers from respondents either in person or via open-test responses. This type of research is usually carried out with small groups and takes the form of in-person focus groups, telephone interviews or detailed surveys with free text responses.
The common (and simplest) method for selecting participants for focus groups is called "purposive" or "convenience" sampling. This means that you select those members of the community who you think will provide you with the best information. It need not be a random selection; indeed, a random sample may be foolish.
In within-subjects designs, a small sample size could be defined as having less than 20 observations. A relatively large sample size or pool of participants could defined as more than 50 independent observations in a between-subjects design, more than 100 observations in a mixed or multivariate design.
As a general rule, sample sizes of 200 to 300 respondents provide an acceptable margin of error and fall before the point of diminishing returns.
The higher the sample size, the higher the power of the test and the better the external validity of the research findings. Survey research generally accepts for quantitative studies, therefore, it is ideal to achieve a number of respondents exceeding 200.
In general, it's a good idea to start with 5 users, fix the errors that you find, and then slowly increase the number of users on further iterations if you think that you've made great progress. But, in practice, you can easily get a sense of how much insight you've found with 5 users.
Is 6 a good sample size for qualitative research?
Based on research conducted on this very issue, 30 seems to be a good number for the most comprehensive assessment. Some studies have noted having a sample size as little as 10 can be extremely fruitful, and still yield applicable results.
A sample size of 30 often increases the confidence interval of your population data set enough to warrant assertions against your findings.4 The higher your sample size, the more likely the sample will be representative of your population set.
“A minimum of 30 observations is sufficient to conduct significant statistics.” This is open to many interpretations of which the most fallible one is that the sample size of 30 is enough to trust your confidence interval.
Most statisticians agree that the minimum sample size to get any kind of meaningful result is 100. If your population is less than 100 then you really need to survey all of them.
Hence, Median gives the best average for qualitative data.